Rant number 311
I used to listen to Chris Moyles in the morning (as did many others,) each morning on the way to work.
I can't say that I always agreed with what he did however, he was funny - and it was quite giggle some.
A couple of months ago however, it was decided that Chris Moyles was too old to entertain us folk in the 15-29 age bracket.
No, what they needed was someone who could get enthusiastic about one direction (shit) and dub-step (really shit) and X-factor manufactured pop moppets (really really shit) and 'yoof culture.'
What they needed, was a stupid hair cutted wanker with no entertainment value and with delusions of being hilarious - Nick Fucking Grimshaw. God that guy is irritating.
As an example, he today said that Robbie Williams was too old to be played on radio one. Just like Chris Moyles was too old to entertain people of a younger age group - you see?
It truly is ludicrous to say that someone needs to be of your age group to be relevant to you. Age is so irrelevant.
For instance: I find Stephen Fry fascinating, Jimmy Carr hilarious, Eric Whitacre phantasmagorical, Antony Hopkins breathtaking and Michael Cane enchanting.
On the other hand however, I find: Cheryl Cole vapid, Dappy franky farcical, Russel Brand tedious, One Direction directionless (excuse the pun) and Will I Am impotent.
What is meant to be more relevant to me? The stuff and people I hate, and that does not stimulate me intellectually or physically - but is by people my age or the people I admire and would aspire to be?
Exactly.
As for Nick Grimshaw, I'm pretty sure there isn't any one adjective I could use for him.
I'll go for 'stupidhaireddullboringselflovingwankstain' though. Look out for that word in the dictionary any day now boys and girls.
Rant over.
No comments:
Post a Comment